Aten et al. (1982) demonstrated that a group of mild moderate chronica
lly aphasic individuals made statistically significant improvement on
the CADL subsequent to group treatment emphasizing functional communic
ation skills. However, no improvement was apparent on the PICA. The pr
esent study investigated the effects of a relatively more structured g
roup treatment programme on the communication ability of chronically a
phasic patients. Ten aphasics, a minimum of 18 months post-onset, part
icipated in a 60-week programme that included two series of 20 weeks o
f group treatment and 10 weeks of treatment withdrawal. The chronic ap
hasic subjects in this study did make gains in overall communication a
bility after 20 weeks of structured group treatment, and initial gains
were retained throughout treatment withdrawals. Reinitiation of struc
tured treatment after a no-treatment interval resulted in a significan
t gain in communication ability as measured by the PICA. Significant C
ADL gains were limited to the first treatment interval, probably refle
cting the broad functional communication context of the group interven
tion and the validity of the CADL in assessing factors of functional c
ommunication adequacy. The pattern of overall PICA improvement suggest
s that group treatment effected continued enhancement of the relativel
y discrete modality-specific communication processes measured by that
instrument. Thus, while the communication treatment emphasis was broad
ly similar in the two studies, the careful structuring of the group co
mmunication intervention in the present study apparently enhanced the
skills tested by the PICA.