M. Confortini et al., INTRALABORATORY REPRODUCIBILITY IN CERVICAL CYTOLOGY - RESULTS OF THEAPPLICATION OF A 100-SLIDE SET, Acta cytologica, 37(1), 1993, pp. 49-54
In order to evaluate the agreement and accuracy of cervical (vaginal)
cytologic diagnoses, 16 cytologists from a large laboratory in Florenc
e, Italy, with experience ranging from 2 to 25 years, independently ex
amined a set of 100 slides. A common reporting form based on a seven-c
ategory classification system was used. Concordance was calculated for
each pairwise comparison between the 16 cytologists and between each
cytologist and the target diagnosis. The values of the K statistic for
the whole laboratory were .49 for the multiple raters comparison and
.59 for the target diagnosis comparison, showing a relatively good deg
ree of agreement.