D. Sim et al., EVALUATION OF BIOPHYSICAL FETAL ASSESSMENT IN HIGH-RISK PREGNANCY TO ASSESS ULTRASOUND PARAMETERS SUITABLE FOR SCREENING IN THE LOW-RISK POPULATION, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 3(1), 1993, pp. 11-17
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Acoustics,"Obsetric & Gynecology","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
During a 1-year period, 662 pregnant women at 24-43 weeks' gestation w
ere referred to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, at the Q
ueens University Belfast, for fetal assessment because they were clini
cally suspected to be at high risk of perinatal complications. The res
ults of our investigations were made available to the referring obstet
ricians who undertook the further management of the pregnancies. Subse
quently. six pregnancies resulted in perinatal deaths and 97 (14.7%) i
n the delivery of small-for-gestational-age infants. We restrospective
ly analyzed the data from ultrasonographic evaluation of the fetus and
subjective and objective assessments of the amniotic fluid volume to
determine their value in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
A fetal abdominal circumference < 10th centile for gestation or a subj
ectively reduced amniotic fluid volume identified 87 (90%) of small-fo
r-gestational-age infants and five of the six perinatal deaths. When c
omparing the abdominal circumference and subjective liquor volume, bot
h were sensitive in predicting delivery of a small-for-gestational-age
fetus (sensitivity 86% vs. 53%, respectively) and perinatal death (se
nsitivity 50% vs. 83%, respectively). We suggest that, since assessmen
ts of these two factors are complementary in evaluating a high-risk pr
egnancy and can be measured in under 5 min, they now warrant considera
tion for screening in a prospective randomized trial in an unselected
low-risk population.