The purpose of this study is to evaluate several potential theoretical
frameworks for understanding the social psychological processes under
lying the effects of momentum. Using an experimental design embedded w
ithin a national survey conducted during the 1992 Democratic president
ial primary season, I examined several potential explanations for chan
ges in candidate preference that result from changing perceptions of p
ublic support. Findings were most supportive of In explanation based o
n the cognitive responses elicited by hearing about others' views. Con
sensus cues stimulated additional information processing and a reasses
sment of the individual's own position; information about mass support
for candidates triggered respondents who were only moderately involve
d in this decisionmaking process to mentally rehearse potential reason
s for supporting or opposing the candidates. By priming these thoughts
, people's own opinions were moved in the direction of the arguments t
hat would not otherwise have come to mind.