J. Schulman et al., EXPOSURE MISCLASSIFICATION DUE TO RESIDENTIAL-MOBILITY DURING PREGNANCY IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS OF CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS, Archives of environmental health, 48(2), 1993, pp. 114-119
This study addressed the question of how maternal migration between co
nception and birth affects estimates of risk in studies of congenital
malformations when movement is related to the exposure. For example, i
n studying the potential association between proximity to a chemical w
aste site and the occurrence of birth defects, incorrect inferences mi
ght be drawn if maternal residence at birth was used as a surrogate fo
r exposure at conception in the case when a significant amount of medi
a attention influenced some women to move away from the site after bec
oming pregnant. A simple statistical model is proposed that defines th
e distance to a fixed exposure point measured at birth as a function o
f the distance to the point measured at conception, the probability of
movement, the direction of movement, and the distance moved. Bias is
the difference between the expected results when distance is measured
at birth versus conception. The amount of bias can be substantial for
movement patterns that may be likely to occur. This simplified model w
as used in an effort to explore and better understand the relationship
s between maternal migration and risk.