This paper constructs an equilibrium job-matching model where workers
differ in their attachment to the labor force. The model predicts that
workers with weaker attachment to the labor market will receive lower
starting wages and lower post-training wages, and will be placed in j
obs that offer less training and use less capital. The implications of
the model for gender differences in pay and job assignment are tested
with the EOPP data set. Our findings suggest that while training inte
nsity during the first three months of employment is similar in positi
ons filled by males and females, females are employed in positions tha
t have a shorter duration of on-the-job training and that use less cap
ital. These differences in on-the-job training and capital in position
s filled by men and women, as well as a lower market value for women's
prior labor market experience, account for a substantial part of the
gap in wages between males and females.