A. Munshi et al., EVALUATION OF PHYLLANTHUS-AMARUS AND PHYLLANTHUS-MADERASPATENSIS AS AGENTS FOR POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS IN NEONATAL DUCK HEPATITIS-B VIRUS-INFECTION, Journal of medical virology, 40(1), 1993, pp. 53-58
The therapeutic potential of plant extracts of Phyllanthus amarus and
Phyllanthus maderas patensis for postexposure prophylaxis against infe
ction by Hepadnaviruses was studied in ducklings infected by the duck
hepatitis B virus (DHBV). Forty-four Pekin ducklings were inoculated i
ntraperitoneally with DHBV at 24 hr post-hatch. They were treated by i
ntraperitoneal injection of Phyllanthus amarus (aqueous extract) (100
mg/kg body weight) or Phyllanthus mad eraspatensis (alcoholic extract)
(100 mg/kg body weight) for a period of 4 weeks. Infected ducklings t
reated with saline served as controls. Weekly serum samples obtained b
efore, during, and after treatment were analysed for the presence of D
HBV DNA in serum by dot blot hybridisation using alpha P-32-labelled p
robes. Liver tissue was collected after killing the ducks at various t
ime intervals and was studied for replicative status of the viral DNA
and liver histopathology; 17 of 21 ducks were viraemic on completion o
f treatment with Phyllanthus amarus. At 16 week posttreatment follow-u
p four of seven animals remained viraemic. Similar results were obtain
ed with Phyllanthus maderaspatensis. There was no alteration in DHBV r
eplication in the liver. No toxicity was observed with this treatment.
These observations suggest that Phyllanthus amarus and Phyllanthus ma
deraspatensis are not useful as therapeutic agents for post-exposure p
rophylaxis against DHBV infection.