MOLECULAR-SIZE AND FLEXIBILITY AS DETERMINANTS OF SELECTIVITY IN THE OF OXIDATION OF N-METHYL-4-PHENYL-1,2,3,6-TETRAHYDROPYRIDINE ANALOGS MONOAMINE OXIDASE-A AND OXIDASE-B
Smn. Efange et al., MOLECULAR-SIZE AND FLEXIBILITY AS DETERMINANTS OF SELECTIVITY IN THE OF OXIDATION OF N-METHYL-4-PHENYL-1,2,3,6-TETRAHYDROPYRIDINE ANALOGS MONOAMINE OXIDASE-A AND OXIDASE-B, Journal of medicinal chemistry, 36(9), 1993, pp. 1278-1283
The introduction of a methylene bridge between the phenyl and tetrahyd
ropyridyl moieties of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MP
TP) results in increased selectivity for monoamine oxidase B (MAO B) o
ver monoamine oxidase A (MAO A). However, lengthening of this bridge r
esults in a total loss of selectivity. In the present study, a number
of isomeric 4-naphthyl-, 4-(naphthylalkyl)-,4-thienyl-, and 4-(thienyl
alkyl)tetrahydropyridines, conformationally restrained and flexible an
alogs of MPTP, were synthesized and evaluated as potential selective s
ubstrates of MAO A and B. In terms of the parameter (turnover number)/
K(m), the bulky naphthyl analogs were invariably better substrates of
MAO A than kynuramine, the reference substrate for this enzyme. In add
ition, all naphthyl analogs, regardless of conformational mobility, we
re more effective substrates of MAO A than MAO B. Similarly, all thien
yl analogs were found to be more effective substrates of MAO B. In con
trast to the naphthalenes, the conformationally restrained thiophenes
9a and 10a were found to be poor substrates of MAO B, relative to benz
ylamine, the reference substrate. These results suggest that the selec
tivity of these compounds for either MAO A or B is determined by the c
omplex interplay of molecular size and flexibility. In this interplay,
either one of these two factors may predominate.