DIFFERENTIAL SUBUNIT DEPENDENCE OF THE ACTIONS OF THE GENERAL-ANESTHETICS ALPHAXALONE AND ETOMIDATE AT GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC-ACID TYPE-A RECEPTORS EXPRESSED IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS OOCYTES
E. Sanna et al., DIFFERENTIAL SUBUNIT DEPENDENCE OF THE ACTIONS OF THE GENERAL-ANESTHETICS ALPHAXALONE AND ETOMIDATE AT GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC-ACID TYPE-A RECEPTORS EXPRESSED IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS OOCYTES, Molecular pharmacology, 51(3), 1997, pp. 484-490
The effects of subunit composition of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GAB
A) type A receptor on the multiple actions of the general anesthetics
alphaxalone and etomidate were investigated. The abilities of the two
drugs to activate directly Cl- currents and to modulate GABA-evoked Cl
- currents mediated by human recombinant GABA(A) receptors composed of
alpha 1, gamma 2S, and either beta 1, beta 2, or beta 3 subunit expre
ssed in Xenopus laevis oocytes were compared. Both alphaxalone and eto
midate evoked Cl- currents in alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S, alpha 1 beta 2
gamma 2S, and alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2S receptors, an action that was bl
ocked by both SR 95531 and picrotoxin. However, although maximal curre
nt activation by alphaxalone varied only slightly with the specific be
ta subunit isoform present, the efficacy of etomidate showed a rank or
der of beta 3 > beta 2 >>> beta 1. In addition, beta 1 homomeric recep
tors were markedly activated by etomidate but not by alphaxalone. Conv
ersely, receptors consisting of alpha 1 and gamma 2S subunits were mar
kedly activated by alphaxalone but not by etomidate. The modulatory ef
fect of alphaxalone was also not markedly influenced by the beta-speci
fic subunit isoform, whereas the modulatory efficacy of etomidate show
ed a rank order of beta 3 > beta 2 much greater than beta 1. These res
ults further demonstrate that the actions of general anesthetics at GA
BA(A) receptors are influenced by receptor subunit composition, and th
ey suggest that the effects of alphaxalone and etomidate are mediated
by different binding sites on the receptor complex.