A COMPARISON OF FEMORAL-NECK FIXATION WITH THE RECONSTRUCTION NAIL VERSUS CANCELLOUS SCREWS IN ANATOMIC SPECIMENS

Citation
Jr. Ramser et al., A COMPARISON OF FEMORAL-NECK FIXATION WITH THE RECONSTRUCTION NAIL VERSUS CANCELLOUS SCREWS IN ANATOMIC SPECIMENS, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (290), 1993, pp. 189-196
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Orthopedics
ISSN journal
0009921X
Issue
290
Year of publication
1993
Pages
189 - 196
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(1993):290<189:ACOFFW>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Femoral neck fixation techniques were applied to five matched pairs of autopsy specimens to evaluate the fixation of the Russell-Taylor femo ral nail in ipsilateral neck and shaft fractures of the femur. Reconst ruction nail fixation of the femoral neck was compared with that of th ree parallel screws. 'rhe intact and postfixation femora were subjecte d to an applied bending moment in 0-degrees, 30-degrees, and 90-degree s of simulated hip flexion. The bending stiffness was determined from the load deformation data for each intact femur and then after the app ropriate fixation. The fatigue response of the fixation, presence of o steopenia, degree of fracture reduction, and device alignment showed t hat the stiffness ratio (fixed to normal) of the nail was greater in m ost specimens. There was no statistical difference in retained stiffne ss after cyclic loading between the nail and cancellous screw fixation s. The ultimate strength of the nail was 2.5 times the strength of the screw fixation of the femoral neck. Thus, the nail provided biomechan ically sound fixation of the femoral neck.