RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Digital acquisition systems currently availa
ble limit spatial resolution in digital mammography to roughly 0.1 mm/
pixel. The objective of this study is to determine if high-quality mam
mography is possible at this resolution. METHODS. The influence of spa
tial resolution on diagnostic quality was investigated by comparing ob
server performance on film to that on digitized film. A 0.1-mm samplin
g distance was used for digitization. Detection of mammographic detail
s was studied by measuring threshold contrast as a function of detail
size for small circular objects in the range of 0.12 to 2.5 mm. Charac
terization of microcalcifications was investigated in a receiver opera
ting characteristic (ROC) study, in which 10 radiologists read 72 mamm
ographic details with microcalcifications, both digitally and on film.
RESULTS. Digitization improved the detectability of the larger, low c
ontrast objects, whereas for small objects the detectability did not c
hange. The authors found that even under the most optimal circumstance
s, isolated spherical calcifications with diameters smaller than 0.13
mm are not detectable with film-screen mammography, despite its resolu
tion limit of 15 line patterns per mm (lp/mm). The ability to characte
rize microcalcification clusters did not change significantly with dig
itization. However, the results suggest that differentiation of benign
from malignant cases decreases slightly, and that characterization of
different types of malignancies somewhat improves by digitization. Me
an differences between the two modalities were considerably smaller th
an the interobserver variability. CONCLUSION. A relatively low spatial
resolution of 0.1 mm/pixel does not prohibit high-quality diagnostic
performance in digital mammography.