Tj. Lockett et al., ROUGH GENES WITH DEFORMED HOMEOBOX SUBSTITUTIONS EXHIBIT ROUGH REGULATORY SPECIFICITY DURING DROSOPHILA EYE DEVELOPMENT, Mechanisms of development, 41(1), 1993, pp. 57-68
In certain cases, homeobox genes with different in vivo roles encode p
roteins with similar in vitro DNA binding specificities. To test the r
ole of the homeobox in the regulatory specificity of such genes, rough
homeobox sequences were changed in part or entirely to those of the D
eformed gene, and the modified rough genes tested for their ability to
rescue the rough mutant phenotype. Surprisingly, the chimaeric genes
retained levels of rough regulatory specificity but acquired no novel
functions. These results suggest that factors other than the DNA bindi
ng specificity of the homeodomain play crucial roles in determining th
e target, and thus the regulatory specificity, of such proteins.