TREATMENT OF ONYCHOMYCOSIS - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON STUDY WITH TOPICAL BIFONAZOLE-UREA OINTMENT ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH SHORT-DURATION ORAL GRISEOFULVIN
R. Friedmanbirnbaum et al., TREATMENT OF ONYCHOMYCOSIS - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON STUDY WITH TOPICAL BIFONAZOLE-UREA OINTMENT ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH SHORT-DURATION ORAL GRISEOFULVIN, International journal of dermatology, 36(1), 1997, pp. 67-69
A parallel-group double-blind study was carried out which compared the
efficacy of chemical avulsion of affected nail by urea 40% and bifona
zole 1% cream alone with that of the same local therapy combined with
short-term oral griseofulvin in onychomycosis. A total of 120 patients
were included in the study. Patients' characteristics were comparable
in both treatment groups. Of the 98 patients fully evaluated, 91 had
toenail involvement and only seven had fingernail involvement. Forty-s
ix of the patients were men and 51 were women. The mean age of the pat
ients was 47.14 +/- 13.84 years (range 17-80 years). The duration of o
nychomycosis was for more than 1 year in 96 patients and for 3 months
duration in only one patient, who was in the placebo group. Forty pati
ents had received different previous therapies. All topical treatments
were discontinued for at least 2 weeks and oral therapy for at least
2 months prior to the beginning of the study. The diagnosis was confir
med by positive mycologic cultures. Trychophyton rubrum was identified
as the pathogen in 90 patients, 45 in each group, T. tonsurans in fou
r patients, two in each group, and T. mentagrophytes in three patients
, two in the griseofulvin treated group, and one in the placebo group.
The first phase of treatment given to all patients consisted of occlu
sive dressing every 24 h with urea 40% and bifonazole 1% ointment unti
l the infected nail became completely detached. Subsequently, in the s
econd phase bifonazole 1% cream was applied to the nail bed every 24 h
for 4 weeks. In addition, concomitantly with the bifonazole cream the
patients were randomly allocated to a daily oral double-blind treatme
nt with griseofulvin 500 mg or placebo, for 4 weeks. Clinical and myco
logic evaluations were carried out at baseline, immediately after remo
val of the nail, and. at 3 days, 4 weeks, and 4 months after the end o
f treatment with bifonazole cream and griseofulvin/placebo tablets. My
cologic examination included identification of fungi by KOH preparatio
n and culture on potato dextrose agar. Positive cultures were transfer
red for identification on Sabouraud's. Criteria for evaluation of effi
cacy comprised: ''cure'' defined as clinical and mycologic cure (fresh
specimen and culture negative) at both investigation times after the
end of treatment; ''late cure'' defined as mycologic cure at both inve
stigation times after the end of treatment, clinical clearing of the n
ail only 4 months after the end of treatment; ''improvement'' defined
as mycologic cure and only partial clinical improvement at both times
after the end of treatment; ''failure'' indicating no mycologic cure (
fresh specimen and/or culture positive); and ''relapse'' signifying a
change from negative findings 1 month after the end of treatment to po
sitive findings 4 months after the end of treatment. Adverse reactions
were evaluated on each visit. Only those patients who had completed c
linical and mycologic evaluation during the entire study were included
in the final statistical analysis. Those patients with partial evalua
tion were included only in the evaluation of adverse events. Based on
the assumptions of a failure rate (failure and relapse) of 30% with bi
fonazole cream alone and of 10% with bifonazole cream and griseofulvin
tablets, a = 0.05 and b = 0.2, the required sample size was at least
58 patients for each treatment group (Casagrande formula, one-sided te
st). The primary efficacy variable ''assessment of treatment'' (cure a
nd improvement versus failure and relapse) was tested for treatment di
fferences by Fisher's exact test (a = 0.05, one-sided test; H-0, no ad
vantage with additional systemic therapy of griseofulvin). Additionall
y, the relapse rates of both treatments were tested exploratively in t
he same way as the primary efficacy variable. All other data were anal
yzed descriptively.