TREATMENT LENGTH AND TERMINATION CONTRACTS IN DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY -A COMPARISON OF FINDINGS FROM 2 INDEPENDENT STUDIES OF BRIEF DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY
P. Hoglend et We. Piper, TREATMENT LENGTH AND TERMINATION CONTRACTS IN DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY -A COMPARISON OF FINDINGS FROM 2 INDEPENDENT STUDIES OF BRIEF DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY, Nordic journal of psychiatry, 51(1), 1997, pp. 37-42
The associations between use of specific techniques and treatment outc
ome were very similar in two independent studies of brief dynamic psyc
hotherapy in Edmonton, Canada, and Oslo. However, the associations bet
ween treatment length and outcome were the opposite in the two studies
. The Edmonton study used a fixed time limit while the Oslo study used
open-ended treatment, which may have contributed to the difference. P
atients with a high quality of object relations (QOR) were able to mak
e optimal use of the expected treatment length in both time-limited an
d formally open-ended brief therapy, with regard to treatment-specific
changes found at follow-up. In contrast, low QOR patients tended to d
o relatively better with fewer sessions than 20 in time-limited therap
y (Edmonton) but more than 35-40 sessions in formally open-ended thera
py (Oslo). These findings elucidate the complex interaction among pati
ent characteristics, treatment length, type of outcome, and contractua
l factors in psychotherapy.