EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF THE ULTRASENSITIVE IMMUNOFLUOMETRIC ASSAY FOR GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) AND OF THE CORTISOL SECRETORY PATTERN IN PREDICTION OF THE LINEAR GROWTH-RESPONSE TO TREATMENT WITH GH
Aw. Root et al., EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF THE ULTRASENSITIVE IMMUNOFLUOMETRIC ASSAY FOR GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) AND OF THE CORTISOL SECRETORY PATTERN IN PREDICTION OF THE LINEAR GROWTH-RESPONSE TO TREATMENT WITH GH, Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism, 10(1), 1997, pp. 3-10
Objectives: To evaluate the utility of an ultrasensitive IFMA for huma
n 22 kDa GH in assessment of GH secretion and prediction of the linear
growth response to exogenous GH. Methods: Utilizing Delfia reagents s
upplied by Wallac-OY, an ultrasensitive IFMA for GH was established. S
erum GH concentrations from 15 children/adolescents undergoing 24 hour
GH secretory profiles with sampling at 20 minute intervals were analy
zed by both IFMA and RIA. Cortisol values were also measured. Twelve c
hildren were later treated with GH. The 24 hour GH and cortisol secret
ory profiles were analyzed by the Cluster program and the relationship
s of these profiles to the linear growth response to exogenous GH dete
rmined. Results: The sensitivity of the IFMA for GH relative to a zero
standard was 0.005 ng/ml; intra-assay coefficients of variation range
d from 12% at a GB concentration of 0.005 ng/ml to 4% at 0.038 ng/ml;
interassay coefficients of variation ranged from 34% at a GH concentra
tion of 0.005 ng/ml to 10.5% at 2.7 ng/ml and to 2.7% at 12.7 ng/ml. A
bove assay sensitivity, there was good correlation between GH concentr
ations determined by IFMA and those by IRMA and RTA (r=0.998 and 0.992
respectively). The number of GH secretory peaks identified by IFMA wa
s significantly greater than that detected by RIA (10.6 +/- 3.2 [SD] v
s 6.7 +/- 3.3/24 hours, p=0.0001 by paired t-test). There were few sig
nificant relationships between any parameter of GH secretion measured
by RIA or IFMA (peak GH pulse amplitude, percent increase in amplitude
, area under the peak, interpeak interval) and the pretreatment growth
rate, the growth velocity while receiving GH therapy, or the incremen
t in growth rate during administration of GH. The number of GH secreto
ry peaks determined by RIA correlated weakly with the pretreatment gro
wth rate. There was no meaningful relationship between the serum conce
ntrations of cortisol and GH-IFMA. Peak GH concentrations and nadir co
rtisol values were exactly coincident in 15.7% (25/159); 42.8% of nadi
r cortisol values coincided with or were within +/- 20 minutes of peak
GH values (68/159). However, there was no relationship between the nu
mber of cortisol secretory peaks, the pooled 24 hour and nocturnal con
centrations of cortisol and the pretreatment growth velocity, the grow
th rate or increment in growth velocity during administration of GH. C
onclusions: Despite the increased sensitivity of the IFMA and its abil
ity to detect pulsatile GH secretion heretofore unidentified, data ft
om this GH assay were not useful in predicting first year growth rate
during administration of GH. The secretory pattern of cortisol was not
helpful in predicting the growth response to GH.