Despite a prodigious amount of work on the physiology of IgA productio
n in man, and many studies on the immunopathology of IgA nephropathy,
ranging from the immunogenetics to the immune response to chemical cha
racteristics of the IgA, we are hardly any nearer to defining the path
ogenesis of this disease. One of the main changes in our understanding
has been to recognise that the bone marrow, now known to produce norm
ally one-third of the body's IgA, overproduces this immunoglobulin in
IgA nephropathy. This alters the previous notion that IgA nephropathy
was due simply to IgA production in the mucosa, although a mucosal com
ponent is not excluded. Certain characteristics of the IgA in the dise
ased kidney and the circulation have been defined: it is of subclass I
gA 1 and has a higher proportion of lambda light chains and negative c
harge than in normal subjects. The specificities of the IgA, either in
the kidney or in complexes, have not helped to clarify the pathogenes
is. They have been found for a wide range of endogenous and exogenous
antigens, suggesting that the antibody activity represents polyclonal
B cell activation. These findings have not helped to confirm the preva
iling theory that IgA nephropathy is an immune complex disease. Other
theories put forward are that IgA nephropathy is an autoimmune disease
, glomerular components or IgA itself being among the candidate antige
ns, or that there is primary dysregulation of the IgA immune system. A
t this stage of development in our understanding of this common nephro
pathy, it is important to guard against the assumption that idiopathic
IgA nephropathy is one disease and is the result of a single pathogen
etic mechanism.