Db. Busch et al., PHENOTYPIC HETEROGENEITY IN NUCLEOTIDE EXCISION-REPAIR MUTANTS OF RODENT COMPLEMENTATION GROUP-1 AND GROUP-4, Mutation research. DNA repair, 383(2), 1997, pp. 91-106
Rodent ultraviolet light (UV)-sensitive mutant cells in complementatio
n groups (CGs) 1 and 4 normally are known for their extraordinary (sim
ilar to 80-100 x) sensitivity to mitomycin C (MMC), although some CG1
mutants with reduced MMC sensitivity were previously reported (Stefani
ni et al. (1987) Cytotechnology 1, 91). We report here new CG1 and CG4
mutants with only 1.6-10 x wild-type MMC sensitivity despite low unsc
heduled DNA synthesis (UDS) levels, Mutant UV140, in UV CG4, has simil
ar to 3.8 x the UV sensitivity of parental line AA8, similar to 1.6 x
wild-type MMC sensitivity, wild-type X-ray and ethyl methanesulfonate
(EMS) sensitivity, and is only slightly (similar to 1.4 x)hypermutable
to 8-azaadenine resistance by UV light. It has moderately decreased i
ncision of UV-damaged DNA, has moderately decreased removal of (6-4) p
hotoproducts, and is profoundly deficient in UDS after UV. After UV, i
t shows abnormally decreased DNA synthesis and persistently decreased
RNA synthesis. In addition a cell-free extract of this mutant displays
strongly reduced nucleotide excision repair synthesis using DNA treat
ed with N-acetoxy-acetyl-amino-fluorene (AAF). The extract selectively
fails to complement extracts of group 1 and 4 mutants consistent with
the notion that the affected proteins, ERCC1 and ERCC4, are part of t
he same complex and that mutations in one subunit also affect the othe
r component. Mutant UV212 is a CG1 mutant with similar to 3.3 x wild-t
ype UV and similar to 5-10 x wild-type MMC sensitivity, with profoundl
y deficient UDS and hypermutability (similar to 5.8 x) by UV. Mutant U
V201, probably in CG1, is only slightly (similar to 1.5 x) UV-sensitiv
e and has near wild-type (1.02 x) UV mutability. These unusual group 1
and 4 mutants demonstrate that the unique UV and MMC sensitivity phen
otypes displayed by these groups can be separated and support the idea
that they are the result of distinct repair functions of the correspo
nding ERCC1 and ERCC4 genes: nucleotide excision repair for UV lesions
and a separate repair pathway for removal of interstrand crosslinks.