We investigate parallel analysis (PA), a selection rule for the number
-of-factors problem, from the point of view of permutation assessment.
The idea of applying permutation test ideas to PA leads to a quasi-in
ferential, non-parametric version of PA which accounts not only for fi
nite-sample bias but sampling variability as well. We give evidence, h
owever, that quasi-inferential PA based on normal random variates (as
opposed to data permutations) is surprisingly independent of distribut
ional assumptions, and enjoys therefore certain non-parametric propert
ies as well. This is a justification for providing tables for quasi-in
ferential PA. Based on permutation theory, we compare PA of principal
components with PA of principal factor analysis and show that PA of pr
incipal factors may tend to select too many factors. We also apply par
allel analysis to so-called resistant correlations and give evidence t
hat this yields a slightly more conservative factor selection method.
Finally, we apply PA to loadings and show how this provides benchmark
values for loadings which are sensitive to the number of variables, nu
mber of subjects, and order of factors. These values therefore improve
on conventional fixed thresholds such as 0.5 or 0.8 which are used ir
respective of the size of the data or the order of a factor.