As part of quality assurance testing, latex condoms are often screened
for pinholes using water leak tests. This report analyzes the sensiti
vity of two similar tests, both requiring that a condom be filled with
300 mL of water and then examined visually for leakage. One test, a F
ood and Drug Administration protocol, specifies that the condom be fil
led vertically, the open end pinched off, and then rolled horizontally
on a towel. The second test, developed by the American Society for Te
sting and Materials, is the same, except the condom is not rolled, mer
ely placed in a horizontal position and examined. Detectability of a d
efect is dependent on the pressure developed within the condom, wettab
ility of the condom surface by the water, thickness, and expansion of
the condom. Three brands and nine different models were studied to det
ermine the range of values for these variables and the sensitivity of
the tests were then calculated. Sensitivity (minimum hole size detecta
ble) varies from approximately 100 mum radius to 3 mum radius. Note th
at the smallest defect observable is larger than the HIV virus.