Sa. Sattar et al., CHEMICAL DISINFECTION TO INTERRUPT TRANSFER OF RHINOVIRUS TYPE-14 FROM ENVIRONMENTAL SURFACES TO HANDS, Applied and environmental microbiology, 59(5), 1993, pp. 1579-1585
Rhinoviruses can survive on environmental surfaces for several hours u
nder ambient conditions. Hands can readily become contaminated after c
ontact with such surfaces, and self-inoculation may lead to infection.
Whereas hand washing is crucial in preventing the spread of rhinoviru
s colds, proper disinfection of environmental surfaces may further red
uce rhinovirus transmission. In this study, the capacities of Lysol Di
sinfectant Spray (0.1% o-phenylphenol and 79% ethanol), a domestic ble
ach (6% sodium hypochlorite diluted to give 800 ppm of free chlorine),
a quaternary ammonium-based product (7.05% quaternary ammonium dilute
d 1:128 in tap water), and a phenol-based product (14.7% phenol dilute
d 1:256 in tap water) were compared in interrupting the transfer of rh
inovirus type 14 from stainless steel disks to fingerpads of human vol
unteers upon a 10-s contact at a pressure of 1 kg/cm2. Ten microliters
of the virus, suspended in bovine mucin (5 mg/ml), was placed on each
disk, and the inoculum was dried under ambient conditions; the input
number on each disk ranged from 0.5 x 10(5) to 2.1 x 10(6) PFU. The dr
ied virus was exposed to 20 mul of the test disinfectant. The Lysol sp
ray was able to reduce virus infectivity by >99.99% after a contact of
either 1 or 10 min, and no detectable virus was transferred to finger
pads from Lysol-treated disks. The bleach (800 ppm of free chlorine) r
educed the virus titer by 99.7% after a contact time of 10 min, and ag
ain no virus was transferred from the disks treated with it. On the ot
her hand, the quaternary ammonium and phenolic products were able to i
nactivate only 14.7 and 62.3% of the virus on the disks, respectively;
contact of fingerpads with disks treated separately with these produc
ts resulted in the transfer of 8.4% +/- 3.6 and 3.3% +/- 1.9%, respect
ively, of the infectious virus remaining on the disks after the disinf
ectant was allowed to dry. Virus transfer from the control disks was 0
.58% +/- 0.35%. These findings suggest that care must be exercised in
the selection of disinfectants if transfer of rhinoviruses from enviro
nmental surfaces to human hands is to be interrupted efficiently.