GEOCHEMICAL COMPARISON OF THE SUBVOLCANIC APPINITE SUITE OF THE BRITISH CALEDONIDES AND THE DURBACHITE SUITE OF THE CENTRAL-EUROPEAN HERCYNIDES - EVIDENCE FOR ASSOCIATED SHOSHONITIC AND GRANITIC MAGMATISM
Dr. Bowes et J. Kosler, GEOCHEMICAL COMPARISON OF THE SUBVOLCANIC APPINITE SUITE OF THE BRITISH CALEDONIDES AND THE DURBACHITE SUITE OF THE CENTRAL-EUROPEAN HERCYNIDES - EVIDENCE FOR ASSOCIATED SHOSHONITIC AND GRANITIC MAGMATISM, Mineralogy and petrology, 48(1), 1993, pp. 47-63
Subvolcanic ite-hornblendite-kentallenite-diorite-granodiorite masses
of the appinite suite that are spatially and temporally associated wit
h the much more voluminous granitic plutons of the British Caledonides
have major element proportions and REE patterns indicative of shoshon
itic affinities. Hornblendite-monzonite-syenogabbro -pyroxene melasyen
ite-durbachite-biotite-rich syenite-biotite-rich granite masses of the
plutonic durbachite suite of the Bohemian Massif of the Central Europ
ean Hercynides, that also are spatially and temporally associated with
much more voluminous granitic plutons, have geochemical characteristi
cs that generally correspond with those of the appinite suite. Composi
tionally both suites resemble lamprophyres emplaced during the latter
parts of the respective episodes. Both the appinite and durbachite sui
tes show independence of K/Rb and SiO2 with the two suites having main
ly different but somewhat overlapping K/Rb ratios. Other geochemical c
haracters, as shown by fields and trends on K vs Rb, AFM and other plo
ts, point to the durbachite suite representing generally more evolved
products of shoshonitic magma than members of the appinite suite. Howe
ver, there are different geochemical characteristics, including higher
Cr/Ni ratios in the durbachite suite and Co present in lower proporti
ons in the appinite suite. These differences are the result of differe
nt histories of freezing, remelting and partial separation and remixin
g of fractionation products and reflect the explosive subvolcanic vs p
lutonic regimes of the appinitic and durbachitic suites, respectively.
Support for this petrogenesis is provided by mineral compositions and
comparison of compositions of mineral phases and the rocks in which t
hey occur.