Visibility and comprehension of standard text, standard symbolic, and
improved symbolic highway signs were compared among young, middle-aged
, and elderly observers. The average distance at which standard symbol
ic signs could be identified was about two times that of text signs fo
r all three age groups. The visibility distances of the improved symbo
lic signs, which were designed using an optical blur (i.e., low-pass)
approach in order to avoid higher spatial frequencies, exceeded those
of both text and standard symbolic signs. Visibility distance was decr
eased significantly among older drivers on some signs but not others.
There were no significant age differences in the comprehension of symb
olic signs. Acuity, a good predictor of visibility distance of both te
xt and standard symbolic signs, was only weakly related to the visibil
ity distance of the improved symbolic signs. These findings demonstrat
e that low-pass symbolic signs have significant advantages in visibili
ty over their text counterparts for all drivers.