This paper argues that the typical household's saving is better descri
bed by a ''buffer-stock'' version than by the traditional version of t
he Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis (LC/PIH) model. Buffer-stock
behavior emerges if consumers with important income uncertainty are s
ufficiently impatient. In the traditional model, consumption growth is
determined solely by tastes. In contrast, buffer-stock consumers set
average consumption growth equal to average labor income growth, regar
dless of tastes. The model can explain three empirical puzzles: the ''
consumption/income parallel'' documented by Carroll and Summers; the '
'consumption/income divergence'' first documented in the 1930s; and th
e stability of the household age/wealth profile over time despite the
unpredictability of idiosyncratic wealth changes.