Objective: To provide physicians with a review of diagnosis, screening
, staging evaluation, treatment options, prognosis, psychosocial issue
s, economic considerations, and future research directions in the mana
gement of patients with all stages of prostate cancer. Data Sources:A
MEDLINE search of articles relating to the diagnosis, staging, screeni
ng, surgery, radiation therapy, medical management, and research in pr
ostate cancer. Emphasis on information reported from government- and n
ongovernment-sponsored large cooperative trials, consensus development
conferences, and proceedings of prostate cancer organ site workshops.
Study Selection: Results of randomized treatment trials and consensus
summary statements are reported where long-term results (> 5 years fo
llow-up) are available for localized prostate cancer treatment and whe
re survival outcomes are available for metastatic disease treatment. D
ata Synthesis: Both qualitative and quantitative data are reported. In
formation on staging, management, and prognosis of localized prostate
cancer is based on studies that are predominantly nonrandomized, inclu
de heterogeneous patient groups, and often use differing outcome measu
res. Information on management of metastatic prostate cancer is more q
uantitative and includes side effects of treatment and survival result
s obtained from randomized, prospective, multi-institutional studies.
Conclusions: Despite the increase in prostate cancer incidence and det
ection, substantial controversy still exists about the advisability an
d effectiveness of screening programs, the most appropriate staging ev
aluation, and the optimal management of patients with all stages of pr
ostate cancer, Although randomized, prospective studies attempt to add
ress some of these issues, physicians must appreciate inherent ambigui
ties involved in recommending staging and treatment choices.