Jf. Szocik et al., INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF BUPIVACAINE AND LIDOCAINE ON ADRENERGIC NEUROEFFECTOR JUNCTIONS IN RAT TAIL ARTERY, Anesthesiology, 78(5), 1993, pp. 911-917
Background. Various local anesthetic agents have been shown to cause r
elaxation of isolated vascular segments contracted by catecholamines a
nd other constrictor drugs. This report describes the actions of the a
mide-linked local anesthetic, bupivacaine, on adrenergic responsivenes
s of isolated arterial smooth muscle, and compares bupivacaine effects
with those of lidocaine. Methods: Helical strips of rat tail artery m
ounted in a muscle bath for measurement of isometric force generation
were contracted in response to adrenergic nerve stimulation, increased
potassium concentration, tyramine, or exogenous norepinephrine. Resul
ts. Treatment with bupivacaine or lidocaine caused depression of contr
action to all four stimuli. Contraction to adrenergic nerve stimulatio
n was more sensitive to the inhibitory effects of local anesthetics th
an was contraction to elevated potassium, tyramine, or exogenous norep
inephrine. Furthermore, bupivacaine was more effective in reducing con
traction to adrenergic nerve stimulation than was lidocaine (EC50: bup
ivacaine = 4 x 10(-6) m; lidocaine = 61 X 10(-6) M). In arteries incub
ated in solutions containing [H-3]-norepinephrine and mounted for supe
rfusion and isometric force recording, both bupivacaine and lidocaine
(10(-5) m) depressed the contractions and diminished the release of ra
dioactivity evoked by nerve stimulation. At the concentration tested,
bupivacaine was more effective than lidocaine in reducing both contrac
tion and the efflux of radioactivity as indicated by the magnitude of
depression compared with control activities. Conclusions. These findin
gs suggest that lidocaine and bupivacaine depress adrenergic neurotran
smission and inhibit smooth muscle contraction. Bupivacaine is a more
potent inhibitor of adrenergic neurotransmission in the blood vessel w
all than is lidocaine.