Background. The discovery of new properties of angiotensin converting
enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in addition to their well-known ability to low
er blood pressure, such as antiproliferative actions and antiadrenergi
c and vagal-stimulating effects, has contributed to the usefulness of
this class of agents in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular
diseases. Methods and Results. The contribution of an activated endoc
rine and/or cardiac paracrine renin-angiotensin system to the progress
ion of cardiovascular diseases with the exception of renovascular hype
rtension is not fully understood. In particular, the following questio
ns were addressed: 1) Is the facilitation of noradrenaline release in
the genesis of arrhythmias a target for ACE inhibition? 2) Is an impai
red nutritional cardiac blood flow in heart failure a target for ACE i
nhibition? 3) Is the intimal hyperplasia that results from coronary an
gioplasty a target for ACE inhibition? 4) Is the diastolic dysfunction
associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertensio
n a target for ACE inhibition? In an isolated rat heart preparation wi
th ischemia-induced arrhythmias, none of the ACE inhibitors nor an ang
iotensin II antagonist was able to significantly suppress the incidenc
e or severity of arrhythmias. In 12 patients with New York Heart Assoc
iation functional class II-IV heart failure, a fall in cardiac filling
pressures after ACE inhibition was associated with an immediate rise
in cardiac output and an increase in coronary blood flow of almost 30%
. In 24 patients with angina at rest, a preceding percutaneous translu
minal coronary angioplasty, and a second angioplasty, control angiogra
ms at 6 months revealed a high degree of restenosis in both ACE inhibi
tor-treated and placebo patients. Luminal narrowing amounted to 72% in
the placebo group and 61% in the ACE inhibitor group. The differences
between placebo and enalapril were statistically not significant. In
12 patients with essential hypertension treated with 5 mg cilazapril,
left ventricular mass was reduced by 30%, which was closely related to
the change in mean arterial blood pressure. The concomitant normaliza
tion of the diastolic filling pattern by ACE inhibition, however, was
not related to the respective changes in blood pressure. Conclusions.
Promising experimental data regarding the antiproliferative effects of
ACE inhibitors in preventing restenosis could not be transferred into
clinical benefits for patients who underwent repeat coronary angiopla
sty. Possible antiarrhythmic effects of ACE inhibitors are not likely
to be caused by their suppression of noradrenaline release during myoc
ardial ischemia. ACE inhibition was effective in reducing coronary res
istance in patients with severe heart failure, thereby augmenting nutr
itional cardiac blood flow. ACE inhibition also effectively induced a
regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension.
The associated normalization of diastolic filling pattern may represen
t an important goal in the treatment of hypertension.