This study evaluated the retention of a cycling kinetic pattern using
two different feedback schedules and evaluated the potential for feedb
ack dependency in a continuous-task learning environment. Eighteen ine
xperienced cyclists rode a racing bicycle mounted to a fixed-fork Velo
dyne Trainer, with pedal forces monitored by dual piezoelectric transd
ucers. Subjects received right-pedal shear force feedback and a criter
ion pattern emphasizing ''effective'' shear. Concurrent feedback (CFB)
subjects received concurrent feedback 140 ms after the completion of
every other revolution, while summary feedback (SFB) subjects received
averaged feedback between trials. All subjects performed 10 retention
trials without feedback 1 week later. Both groups improved significan
tly during practice, and performance decay in retention was negligible
. Group differences during all phases were not significant. High CFB g
roup proficiency in retention indicated that the detrimental aspects o
f frequent feedback were not significant. High SFB proficiency in rete
ntion suggests that large changes in kinetic patterning are achievable
with relatively few feedback presentations.