Wl. Slaghuis et Sz. Pinkus, VISUAL BACKWARD-MASKING IN CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL-VISION IN LATE-ADOLESCENT DYSLEXICS, Clinical vision sciences, 8(2), 1993, pp. 187-199
1. Visual backward masking in central and peripheral vision was measur
ed in groups of late-adolescent dyslexic and matched normal readers. 2
. For each subject a target duration threshold was measured by randoml
y presenting target letter stimuli at a number of retinal locations in
central vision and in the right and left visual field. 3. Using the t
arget duration estimated for each subject at each retinal location, ba
ckward masking was measured as a function of seven inter-stimulus inte
rvals (ISIs). Recognition error was the dependent measure and a comple
tely randomized design was used across all conditions of the experimen
t. 4. There were no differences between late-adolescent dyslexics and
matched controls in target duration thresholds for isolated target sti
muli in central and peripheral vision. 5. In central vision late-adole
scent dyslexic subjects experienced significantly more backward maskin
g at brief ISIs, a finding similar to that found in preadolescent dysl
exic subjects by Williams, LeCluyse and Bologna [(1990) Clin. Vision S
ci. 5, 335-343]. 6. With masking in the right visual field late-adoles
cent dyslexic subjects showed some evidence for disinhibition at an IS
I of 0 ms and increased masking at intermediate ISIs. No differences i
n backward masking were found between the groups in the left visual fi
eld. 7. The findings are interpreted in terms of a sustained and trans
ient channel model of visual processing. Differences in visual process
ing in central vision in the dyslexic group are explained in terms of
longer durations of visible persistence and increased visual integrati
on between stimuli that are presented in rapid temporal succession. Di
fferences in the right visual field in the dyslexic group are explaine
d in terms of a delayed transient channel response which shifts its in
hibitory activity from brief to intermediate ISIs. 8. The present find
ings provide evidence for the continuation of a visual processing defi
cit evident in preadolescent dyslexics into late-adolescence and indic
ate that the visual processing deficit in dyslexia may not be due to a
temporary developmental delay. 9. The present study also outlines a s
et of criteria for the selection of adult dyslexic subjects and provid
es some evidence that their use selected subjects with a test profile
similar to preadolescent dyslexics.