S. Deglinnocenti et al., THE LEVEL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEORETICAL AND OBSERVED GLOBULAR-CLUSTER LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS, Astronomy and astrophysics, 319(2), 1997, pp. 487-497
Luminosity functions from theoretical stellar evolution calculations a
re compared with observed ones of several galactic globular clusters (
M30, M92, M68, NGC6397, M4, M80, NGC6352, NGC1851). Contrary to earlie
r results of Faulkner & Swenson (1993) and Bolte (1994) we find no sig
nificant discrepancy that could indicate the neglect of important phys
ical effects in the models. However, it is confirmed that the subgiant
branch is the most sensitive part and shows the largest deviations in
the luminosity function comparison, if parameters are unappropriate.
We also find that the main sequence is suited less than the Red Giant
Branch for the calibration of theoretical luminosity functions, mainly
because of apparent completeness problems. While for individual clust
ers different changes in the model assumptions might resolve mismatche
s, there is no systematic trend visible. It rather appears that the qu
ality of the luminosity function in the subgiant part is insufficient
and that improved observations of this particular region are necessary
for a better comparison. At the present quality of luminosity functio
ns theory is in agreement with observations and a postulation of WIMPs
acting in stellar cores does not seem to be justified. However, we co
nclude that improved data for the main sequence and subgiant branch ar
e clearly needed to exploit the potential of luminosity functions as a
diagnostic means for stellar evolution theory.