J. Newman et al., NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE AND RHEOMETRIC STUDIES WITH F-ACTIN PREPARED FROMATP-MONOMERIC OR ADP-MONOMERIC ACTIN, Biophysical journal, 64(5), 1993, pp. 1559-1566
It has recently been reported that polymer actin made from monomer con
taining ATP (ATP-actin) differed in EM appearance and rheological char
acteristics from polymer made from ADP-containing monomers (ADP-actin)
. Further, it was postulated that the ATP-actin polymer was more rigid
due to storage of the energy released by ATP hydrolysis during polyme
rization (Janmey et al. 1990. Nature 347:95-99). Electron micrographs
of our preparations of ADP-actin and ATP-actin polymers show no major
differences in appearance of the filaments. Moreover, the dynamic visc
osity parameters G' and G'' measured for ATP-actin and ADP-actin polym
ers are very different from those reported by Janmey et al., in absolu
te value, in relative differences, and in frequency dependence. We sug
gest that the relatively small differences observed between ATP-actin
and ADP-actin polymer rheological parameters could be due to small dif
ferences either in flexibility or, more probably, in filament lengths.
We have measured nucleotide exchange on ATP-actin and ADP-actin polym
ers by incorporation of alpha-P-32-ATP and found it to be very slow, i
n agreement with earlier literature reports, and in contradiction to t
he faster exchange rates reported by Janmey et al. This exchange rate
is much too slow to cause ''reversal'' of ADP-actin polymer to ATP-act
in polymer as reported by Janmey et al. Thus our results do not suppor
t the notion that the energy of actin-bound ATP hydrolysis is trapped
in and significantly modifies the actin polymer structure.