In order to estimate yearly variations and accuracy of prediction of m
aize yield losses due to weeds, we used supplementary maize individual
s that mimic weeds and reduce the experimental variability. Biomass de
crease at various growth stages and grain yield losses of maize were i
nterpreted through regression analyses in terms of density and biomass
of supplementary individuals. Comparison of losses due to weeds and s
upplementary maize does not allow the calculation of equivalent weed-m
aize density or biomass at the same competitive effect. In most cases
regression curves obtained in maize-maize experiments were different f
rom one year to another. The use of results from several trials, previ
ously published, on the effect of plant spacing on maize yield over a
number of years also showed a large variation in predicted values, whi
ch confirmed the inaccuracy of an empirical predictive model using wee
d density and biomass.