Wk. Dong et al., STATIC AND DYNAMIC-RESPONSES OF PERIODONTAL-LIGAMENT MECHANORECEPTORSAND INTRADENTAL MECHANORECEPTORS, Journal of neurophysiology, 69(5), 1993, pp. 1567-1582
1. The response properties of 39 periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors
(PDLMs) and 12 intradental mechanoreceptors (IMs) related to the inta
ct mandibular canine tooth were isolated by extracellular recording me
thods from the ipsilateral trigeminal semilunar ganglion. 2. The stimu
lus threshold and response magnitude of individual PDLMs depended on t
he direction of steady force applied to the intact canine tooth. Canin
e PDLMs as a population, however, did not have a preferred stimulus di
rection. IMs were activated only by a rapid mechanical transient appli
ed to the intact tooth in any direction. The stimulus threshold and re
sponse magnitude of each IM were approximately equipotent in all stimu
lus directions. 3. Application of quantifiable ramp-and-hold stimulati
on showed that PDLMs can encode the intensity of steady forces as well
as the rate of force ramps. Increasing the ramp rates decreased the t
otal ramp discharge but increased the peak discharge frequency. IMs en
coded only the rate of force ramps that were applied by percussion. Hi
gher ramp rates increased both the total discharges and peak discharge
frequency of IMs. 4. The dynamic response properties of PDLMs and IMs
were clearly differentiated by sinusoidal vibratory stimulation. The
maximum frequencies for entrainment of IM discharge at the stimulus cy
cle length (251 +/- 103 Hz, mean +/- SD) and at any periodicity includ
ing multiples of the stimulus cycle length (295 +/- 100 Hz) were signi
ficantly higher than the maximum frequencies for PDLM discharge entrai
nment at the stimulus cycle length (103 +/-53 Hz) and at any periodici
ty (133 +/- 62 Hz). 5. The functional similarities of PDLMs and IMs, r
espectively, to slowly adapting type II mechanoreceptors and Pacinian
corpuscle receptors in the skin are discussed. Our present findings, w
hich complement earlier anatomic and behavioral evidence, strongly sug
gest that IMs subserve nonnociceptive and nonpain functions. Both PDLM
s and IMs may provide a continuum of dynamic afferent inputs necessary
for tactile sensibility of teeth.