Mv. Waalkes et al., INVITRO STABILITY AND CYTOSTATIC ACTIVITY OF LIPOSOMAL FORMULATIONS OF 5-FLUORO-2'-DEOXYURIDINE AND ITS DIACYLATED DERIVATIVES, Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1148(1), 1993, pp. 161-172
The water-soluble antineoplastic agent 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR)
was encapsulated in the water phase of liposomes of different lipid c
ompositions. The retention of this drug upon storage and during contac
t with plasma was assessed. It was found that, upon refrigeration, dif
fusion of FUdR across the liposome bilayer was considerably faster whe
n the drug was encapsulated in fluid-type liposomes (egg PC/PS/CHOL) t
han in solid-type liposomes (DSPC/DPPG/CHOL). With either composition,
leakage of the drug from the liposomes was accelerated upon contact w
ith plasma. To achieve improved liposomal retention of the drug, FUdR
was converted to a lipophilic prodrug by esterifying the free hydroxyl
groups in the deoxyribose moiety with fatty acids of different chain
lengths. Thus FUdR-dipalmitate (C-16) and FUdR-dioctanoate (C-8) were
synthesized and incorporated in liposomes. The dipalmitoyl derivative
could be incorporated upto 13 mol% in solid-type liposomes but to only
2 mol% in fluid-type liposomes. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy r
evealed no major differences between control liposomes and those conta
ining the prodrug. FUdR-dipalmitate was found to be firmly associated
with the liposomal bilayer in both liposome-types: no exchange of the
pro-drug with blood constituents or hydrolysis by serum esterases coul
d be registered when the liposomes were incubated with serum. On the o
ther hand, liposome-incorporated FUdR-dioctanoate was found to be read
ily extracted from the liposomes by serum components (predominantly al
bumin) and was found to be degraded rapidly by serum esterase activity
. The antitumor activity of FUdR-prodrugs was determined using C26 col
on adenocarcinoma cells. This cell line was found to be highly sensiti
ve to FUdR. Liposomal FUdR-dioctanoate inhibited cell growth in the sa
me concentration range as unesterified FUdR. FUdR-dipalmitate, however
, was more than two orders of magnitude less potent in inhibiting cell
proliferation. Its antiproliferative activity was dependent on the li
posome-type used: when incorporated in fluid-type liposomes, antiproli
ferative activity of FUdR-dipalmitate was several-fold higher than in
solid-type liposomes. The difference in antitumor activity between FUd
R-dipalmitate and FUdR-dioctanoate and between FUdR-dipalmitate in the
fluid- and solid-type liposomes could be explained by differences in
the rate of hydrolysis of the prodrugs to FUdR by esterase activity in
the tumor cells or in the growth medium.