Rm. Harrington et al., BIOMECHANICS OF INDIRECT REDUCTION OF BONE RETROPULSED INTO THE SPINAL-CANAL IN VERTEBRAL FRACTURE, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 18(6), 1993, pp. 692-699
The biomechanics of indirect reduction of bone fragments retropulsed i
nto the spinal canal in a burst fracture were investigated. In this mo
del, tunnels were created in vertebrae L1 and C5 oriented anterior-to-
posterior, allowing access to the posterior longitudinal ligament. A p
robe containing a load-sensing tip was passed through the tunnel. Both
the location of the tip and the load acting on it by posterior deflec
tion of the posterior longitudinal ligament were measured. In the lumb
ar spine, distraction was applied by spinal instrumentation that also
permitted independent kyphotic-lordotic alignment of the vertebrae, In
the cervical spine, axial traction was applied through direct loading
. Several clinically relevant observations were made. It was not possi
ble to produce an anteriorly directed force in the posterior longitudi
nal ligament at less than 35% canal occlusion, partly because the post
erior longitudinal ligament stands away from the midbody of the verteb
ra. Distractive forces of up to 150 N were applied in the lumbar spine
, which were nearly equal to the tensile breaking strength of the isol
ated posterior longitudinal ligament. Regardless of the relative sagit
tal plane angulation of the vertebrae, distraction was the governing f
actor in generating force in the posterior longitudinal ligament. Beca
use positioning the vertebrae in lordosis before applying distraction
significantly slackens the posterior longitudinal ligament, it is sugg
ested that distraction be applied before angular positioning of the ve
rtebrae is performed.