In Sweden, the National Audit Bureau is encouraging attempts at discus
sing the costs of protection. For many years, a government authority c
onsidering new regulations must provide the government with background
material illustrating the costs, the expected benefits, and other asp
ects of the decision. Direct costs should be stated together with nonq
uantifiable factors indicated by a valuation of whether their conseque
nces are positive or negative. Applied to radiation protection, this i
ncludes discussion of the resources worth spending in order to prevent
a case of serious radiation injury. If the marginal cost for a protec
tive measure is <5 million Swedish crowns (5 MSEK; approximately 1 mil
lion U.S. dollars) per prevented case, the radiation protection author
ity considers the measure to be strongly justified. If the cost exceed
s 25 MSEK per case, then very strong reasons are required for implemen
tation of the measure. In the intermediate interval, measures are part
icularly justified if the marginal costs are in the lower end and the
total societal cost of the protection is of little concern at the nati
onal economical level. The interval 5-25 MSEK per case corresponds to
0.4-2 MSEK personsievert-1. Resource allocation for health protection
in general, ethical aspects, and practical difficulties in assessing c
osts and risks are briefly discussed in the paper. Priorities in Swedi
sh radiation protection are presented and a case study for the use of
carbon fiber cassettes in x-ray diagnostics is given as an example.