FODOR, ADAMS AND CAUSAL PROPERTIES - REPLY

In 'Fodor's Modal Argument' I claim that Fodor's latest defence of nar row content does not work. I claim that Fodor's modal argument is an u nsuccessful resurrection of the Logical Connection Argument. Russow cl aims that my arguments fail because I confuse cause properties with ca usal powers, focus on events rather than properties, and overlook the fact that Fodor is trying only to explain narrow behavior. In this pap er, I plead 'not guilty' to all of Fodor's charges. Narrow content sti ll does not exist.