Although expression of the enzyme gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)
is the most common phenotypic marker of preneoplastic foci in the live
rs of carcinogen-treated rats, it is not generally expressed in mouse
liver tumors or hepatic foci. However, several carcinogens, including
safrole and ortho-azoaminotoluene (OAT), have been reported to induce
GGT-positive foci in mice. We asked whether safrole and OAT induce GGT
expression in preneoplastic foci or if these compounds select for a d
istinct set of lesions that can be identified by their GGT-positive ph
enotype. We treated 12-day-old male and female C57BL/6J mice with NN-d
iethylnitrosamine (DEN) (0.20 mumol/g body wt) to initiate hepatocarci
nogenesis. From 6 to 24 weeks of age, during the promotion phase of he
patocarcinogenesis, groups of mice were treated with 3,4,5,3',4',5'-he
xabromobiphenyl (HBB), safrole or OAT. Additional groups of female mic
e were ovariectomized at 6 weeks of age with or without subsequent chr
onic treatment with testosterone. All the animals were killed at 24 we
eks of age and serial liver sections were stained for glucose-6-phosph
atase (G6Pase) or GGT. Both testosterone and HBB were strong promoters
of the development of G6Pase-deficient foci. No GGT-positive foci wer
e observed in animals treated with these agents or with DEN alone. In
mice fed safrole or OAT during the promotion period, female mice devel
oped more G6Pase-deficient foci than male mice, and GGT-positive foci
were observed. Analysis of serial sections revealed that the G6Pase-de
ficient foci and the GGT-positive foci were independent populations. T
he relative number of these two classes of foci varied according to th
e treatment regimen. In females fed safrole, 7% of the foci in the liv
er were GGT-positive while in female mice fed OAT, 45% were GGT-positi
ve. In all groups of mice in which we observed GGT-positive foci and i
n ovariectomized female mice, we noted a third independent population
of foci which demonstrated significantly increased expression of G6Pas
e relative to surrounding normal liver. These data indicate that diffe
rent treatments during the promotion stage of hepatocarcinogenesis in
the mouse may give rise to distinct populations of preneoplastic lesio
ns. Further studies of the molecular events giving rise to these disti
nct lesions will provide insights into the multiple pathways that resu
lt in hepatocarcinogenesis.