Purification of a protein typically involves development of a quantita
tive assay to track protein integrity (e.g. enzyme activity) during su
bsequent isolation steps. The generalized procedure involves choosing
the source of the protein, defining extraction conditions, developing
bulk purification methods followed by refined, more selective methods.
The purification of proteoglycans is often complicated by a) limited
source quantities, b) necessity of chaotropic solvents for efficient e
xtraction, c) their large molecular size and d) lack of defined functi
ons to enable purity (i.e. activity, conformation) to be assessed. Bec
ause the usual goal of proteoglycan purification is physical character
ization (intact molecular weight, core protein and glycosaminoglycan c
lass and size), the problems of a suitable assay and/or native conform
ation are avoided. The 'assay' for tracking proteoglycan isolation typ
ically utilizes uronic acid content or radiolabel incorporation as a m
arker. Once extracted from their cellular/extracellular environment, p
roteoglycans can be isolated by density gradient centrifugation and/or
column chromatography techniques. Recent advances in the composition
of chromatographic supports have enabled the application of ion-exchan
ge. gel permeation, hydrophobic interaction and affinity chromatograph
y resins using efficient high-pressure liquid chromatography to proteo
glycan purification.