S. Thyagarajan et al., UNDERFEEDING-INDUCED SUPPRESSION OF MAMMARY-TUMORS - COUNTERACTION BYESTROGEN AND HALOPERIDOL, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 203(2), 1993, pp. 236-242
The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanism by which un
derfeeding induces regression of carcinogen-induced mammary tumors in
the rat and to determine if tumor regression in underfed rats could be
prevented on a chronic basis by maintaining elevated circulating leve
ls of estrogen and/or prolactin (PRL) by treatment with estradiol benz
oate (EB) and a dopamine receptor blocker, haloperidol (HAL). Female r
ats with 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene-induced mammary tumors were fed a
d libitum (full-fed), half-fed (HF), or half-fed and treated with EB (
HF+EB), HAL (HF+HAL), or both (HF+EB+HAL) for 15 weeks. Tumor diameter
, tumor number, and body weight were determined each week. At the end
of the experiment, hypothalamic concentrations of catecholamines, indo
leamines, and their metabolites were determined by high performance li
quid chromatography. Tumor diameter, tumor number, and body weight inc
reased progressively in the full-fed rats, but decreased significantly
in the HF rats. Treatment of HF rats with EB, HAL, or both prevented
tumor regression, but had no effect on body weight, which declined con
tinuously. In the HF rats, there was an increase in the concentration
of dopamine and a decrease in the concentration of serotonin in the hy
pothalamus, whereas treatment with HAL reversed these effects. EB had
no effect on neurotransmitter concentrations in the HF rats, but treat
ment of HF+EB animals with HAL decreased the dopamine concentration. T
he changes in dopamine and serotonin observed in HF rats are known to
inhibit PRL secretion, whereas HAL, which blocked these changes, is a
well established stimulator of PRL secretion. Since the mammary tumors
are dependent on PRL for development and growth, it is probable that
the regression of these tumors in the HF rats was ultimately due to a
decrease in PRL secretion, and the prevention of this regression in HF
+HAL rats was ultimately due to an increase in PRL secretion. EB, a po
tent PRL stimulator, probably blocked tumor regression in HF+EB rats b
y increasing PRL secretion by a direct effect on the pituitary.