Background-Interpretation of measurements of limited maximal airway na
rrowing, or plateau response, requires knowledge of its variability wi
thin subjects and between methods. Methods-The repeatability of the pl
ateau response to inhaled methacholine with a dosimeter (D) method (ma
ximal dose 210 mumol) and a tidal breathing (T) method (730 mumol), an
d the agreement of the two methods, were measured in 16 subjects with
mild or no asthma. Two tests by each method (D1,D2,T1,T2) were perform
ed in random order over four consecutive days, with a third dosimeter
(D3) test one week later. The dose producing a decrease in forced expi
ratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 10% (PD10) and the plateau were
calculated from each dose-response curve. Results-A plateau was reache
d in all five tests in 12 subjects and in all tests except D3 in 14 su
bjects. PD10 was inversely related to the plateau (r = - 0.95 for D, r
= - 0.77 for T). The 95% ranges for differences between two determina
tions of the plateau in a subject were +/- 11.9% (change in FEV1), +/-
19.2%, and +/- 20.3%, estimated from D1-2 and 1-3, and T1-2 tests, re
spectively. From the same tests the 95% ranges for the difference of a
single determination from an individual's true mean value were +/- 8.
3%, +/- 13.6%, and +/- 14.3%. The limits of agreement between methods
indicated that 95% of the measurements of the plateau by tidal breathi
ng ranged from 15.2% below to 13.3% above those obtained by dosimeter.
There was no significant bias between methods. Tachyphylaxis over 24
hours occurred with PD10 but not with the plateau response. Conclusion
s-The plateau response is a subject characteristic which is independen
t of the method of inhalation challenge testing. Repeatability of the
plateau is low in this group of subjects with low airway responsivenes
s.