SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TERFENADINE PSEUDOEPHEDRINE VERSUS CLEMASTINE PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS

Citation
At. Segal et al., SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TERFENADINE PSEUDOEPHEDRINE VERSUS CLEMASTINE PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS, Annals of allergy, 70(5), 1993, pp. 389-394
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Allergy
Journal title
ISSN journal
00034738
Volume
70
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
389 - 394
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4738(1993)70:5<389:SAEOTP>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel trial was con ducted to compare the efficacy and safety of terfenadine, 60 mg (immed iate-release)/pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, 120 mg (controlled-releas e) (T/Ps) and clemastine fumarate, 1.34 mg (immediate-release)/phenylp ropanolamine, 75 mg (sustained-release) (C/Ph) in a combination tablet b.i.d. in 178 patients (12-59 years of age) with symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. After seven days of treatment, the total symptom s cores recorded in the diaries of 175 patients showed that both therapi es had a highly significant overall treatment effect when compared wit h placebo (P less-than-or-equal-to .02). The overall level of improvem ent, as well as improvement of individual symptoms, was similar with t he two therapies. Total symptom scores assigned by physicians to 170 p atients showed significant and similar levels of improvement with both therapies when compared with placebo (P < .01). The two therapies wer e also similar on physicians' evaluations of overall effectiveness. Bo th therapies relieved most histamine-mediated symptoms as well as nasa l congestion, although only T/Ps showed improvement of the latter symp tom in both the patients' diaries and physicians' evaluations. Among 1 78 patients, drowsiness and fatigue occurred more often in the C/Ph gr oup (25% and 11.7% for the two adverse events, respectively) than in t he T/Ps group (10.2% and 1.7%, respectively). The incidence of insomni a and dry mouth/nose/throat was higher with T/Ps (23.7% and 11.9%, res pectively) than with C/Ph (6.7% and 3.3%, respectively). No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported. These results indicate that T/Ps and C/Ph are both superior to placebo and equally effective in th e treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In addition, wh en used as recommended by current labeling, T/Ps offers a safe, effect ive alternative to C/Ph, particularly where drowsiness and fatigue may be problematic, but at the expense of developing insomnia and dry-mou th symptoms.