Jk. Peat et al., PREDICTIVE NATURE OF BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS AND RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS IN A ONE-YEAR COHORT STUDY OF SYDNEY SCHOOLCHILDREN, The European respiratory journal, 6(5), 1993, pp. 662-669
We wanted to examine the predictive nature, over one year, of bronchia
l hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and recent wheeze (in the previous 12 mont
hs), which are the measurements frequently used to classify asthma for
epidemiology. A prospective cohort study of 236 children, aged 8-11 y
rs, was undertaken, with an initial baseline study, followed by four s
tudies at three monthly intervals over one year. At each study, we mea
sured bronchial responsiveness to histamine by the rapid method, respi
ratory symptoms by parent questionnaire, and atopy by skin prick tests
to common allergens. Airflometer readings, which are closely related
to FEV1, were self-recorded. Baseline data were used to classify child
ren into the four categories of ''current asthma'' (BHR and wheeze), '
'wheeze only'', ''BHR only'', or ''normal''. During the year following
baseline study, the group initially classified as ''wheeze only'' had
normal Airflometer variability, and 59% had wheeze, and 33% had BHR,
which tended to be mild. In the group initially classified as ''BHR on
ly'', 52% had wheeze with a peak in winter, and 62% had BHR during the
following year. This group had more severe bronchial responsiveness a
nd Airflometer variability than the normal and wheeze only groups. The
group initially classified as current asthma had a more severe condit
ion, with continued BHR (100%), and wheeze (93%), increased Airflomete
r variability and more atopy. Thus, the natural history of bronchial r
esponsiveness, respiratory symptoms and allergic history in this group
was different from the other three groups. We conclude that the defin
ition of ''current asthma'' as BE[R plus recent wheeze discriminates t
he group with an ongoing significant abnormality in terms of respirato
ry impairment and, as such, is clearly important for epidemiological s
tudies