PREDICTIVE NATURE OF BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS AND RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS IN A ONE-YEAR COHORT STUDY OF SYDNEY SCHOOLCHILDREN

Citation
Jk. Peat et al., PREDICTIVE NATURE OF BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS AND RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS IN A ONE-YEAR COHORT STUDY OF SYDNEY SCHOOLCHILDREN, The European respiratory journal, 6(5), 1993, pp. 662-669
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
ISSN journal
09031936
Volume
6
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
662 - 669
Database
ISI
SICI code
0903-1936(1993)6:5<662:PNOBRA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
We wanted to examine the predictive nature, over one year, of bronchia l hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and recent wheeze (in the previous 12 mont hs), which are the measurements frequently used to classify asthma for epidemiology. A prospective cohort study of 236 children, aged 8-11 y rs, was undertaken, with an initial baseline study, followed by four s tudies at three monthly intervals over one year. At each study, we mea sured bronchial responsiveness to histamine by the rapid method, respi ratory symptoms by parent questionnaire, and atopy by skin prick tests to common allergens. Airflometer readings, which are closely related to FEV1, were self-recorded. Baseline data were used to classify child ren into the four categories of ''current asthma'' (BHR and wheeze), ' 'wheeze only'', ''BHR only'', or ''normal''. During the year following baseline study, the group initially classified as ''wheeze only'' had normal Airflometer variability, and 59% had wheeze, and 33% had BHR, which tended to be mild. In the group initially classified as ''BHR on ly'', 52% had wheeze with a peak in winter, and 62% had BHR during the following year. This group had more severe bronchial responsiveness a nd Airflometer variability than the normal and wheeze only groups. The group initially classified as current asthma had a more severe condit ion, with continued BHR (100%), and wheeze (93%), increased Airflomete r variability and more atopy. Thus, the natural history of bronchial r esponsiveness, respiratory symptoms and allergic history in this group was different from the other three groups. We conclude that the defin ition of ''current asthma'' as BE[R plus recent wheeze discriminates t he group with an ongoing significant abnormality in terms of respirato ry impairment and, as such, is clearly important for epidemiological s tudies