COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF PROGESTERONE AND PLACENTAL PROTEIN 14 MEASUREMENTS IN THE EVALUATION OF LUTEAL FUNCTION

Citation
Mc. Batista et al., COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF PROGESTERONE AND PLACENTAL PROTEIN 14 MEASUREMENTS IN THE EVALUATION OF LUTEAL FUNCTION, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 168(5), 1993, pp. 1522-1527
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
00029378
Volume
168
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1522 - 1527
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(1993)168:5<1522:COPAPP>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of s ingle or summed measurements of progesterone and placental protein 14, a progestin-dependent endometrial glycoprotein, in the evaluation of luteal function. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-five healthy women had daily bloo d measurements of luteinizing hormone, progesterone, and placental pro tein 14 during one menstrual cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-nine women had nor mal and six had deficient luteal function on the basis of serial proge sterone determinations. Luteal insufficiency was not accurately diagno sed by single progesterone or placental protein 14 values or by integr ated placental protein 14 measurements. In contrast, the condition was correctly identified in all but one cycle when the sum of progesteron e on days 4 and 7 was < 49 nmol/L (1 5.4 ng/ml). A poor correlation wa s found between peak or integrated measurements of progesterone and pl acental protein 14. CONCLUSION: Measurement of serum progesterone, but not placental protein 14, on 2 days of the midluteal phase provides a convenient and reliable test of luteal function.