DYSPEPSIA IN PRIMARY-CARE - PERCEIVED CAUSES, REASONS FOR IMPROVEMENT, AND SATISFACTION WITH CARE

Citation
Jh. Kurata et al., DYSPEPSIA IN PRIMARY-CARE - PERCEIVED CAUSES, REASONS FOR IMPROVEMENT, AND SATISFACTION WITH CARE, Journal of family practice, 44(3), 1997, pp. 281-288
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00943509
Volume
44
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
281 - 288
Database
ISI
SICI code
0094-3509(1997)44:3<281:DIP-PC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
BACKGROUND. While dyspepsia is a common problem in primary care popula tions, very little is known about patient perceptions of medical care for this disease. The present study of patients with dyspepsia treated by primary care physicians looks at causes, procedures, and reasons f or improvement from the patient's viewpoint and relates these factors to patient satisfaction with family physicians' medical care. METHODS. Medical chart and billing data were collected for 545 adult patients who visited five family health centers for digestive complaints during a 6-month period in 1993. A questionnaire was completed by 288 patien ts 6 to 8 weeks after patient's index visit. Baseline findings are rep orted. RESULTS. The two most common causes of gastrointestinal problem s were attributed to stress or anxiety (58%) and diet (46%). Between t he time of the index visit and the baseline survey, 48% reported that they had recovered or improved. Of those who recovered or improved, mo st (75%) credited ''taking GI medicine'' followed by change in diet (4 4%). Patients who reported recovery or improvement of their gastrointe stinal complaints (P < .001) and older patients (P = .032) were the mo st satisfied with overall medical care, Satisfaction with medical care was not associated with insurance coverage, procedures done, race, an tiulcer medication treatment, diagnosis, general health status, or sex . CONCLUSIONS. Specific health status, ie, improvement of gastrointest inal (GI) problems, predicted patient satisfaction for 70% of cases in this study. Most patients who improved credited GI medicines for thei r improvement, and those who improved were more satisfied with their m edical care.