Gp. Connolly et Tw. Stone, ON THE SITE OF ACTION AND INACTIVATION OF ADENOSINE BY THE RAT SUPERIOR CERVICAL-GANGLION, Journal of autonomic pharmacology, 13(3), 1993, pp. 237-247
1 Using an extracellular recording technique, we have investigated the
site of action of adenosine and muscarine on the rat superior cervica
l ganglion (SCG). The adenosine-induced hyperpolarization and muscarin
e-induced depolarization of ganglia were localized to the cell bodies
of the ganglia. Responses to muscarine and adenosine were larger when
recorded via the internal carotid nerve (ICN) compared with the extern
al carotid nerve. Depression of the response to muscarine by adenosine
was similar for both nerve trunks. 2 The effects of adenosine and cyc
lic nucleotides on the d.c. potential and the depolarization to muscar
ine were examined by recording via the ICN. Adenosine at concentration
s up to 1 mM produced concentration-dependent hyperpolarizations. Hype
rpolarization induced by 100 muM adenosine was unaffected by 1 muM tet
rodotoxin or the muscarinic M1-receptor antagonist pirenzepine (0.3 mu
M). In contrast, hyperpolarizations to 100 muM adenosine were signific
antly reduced by 10 muM 8-phenytheophylline (55 +/- 7 muV vs 15 +/- 9
muV, P<0.01, n=4). Two agents known to increase intracellular cAMP, i.
e. 8-bromocyclic-adenosine-3'-5'monophosphate (8BrcAMP) and isoprenali
ne, depolarized ganglia. Depolarizations to 100 nm mucarine were signi
ficantly depressed by adenosine (100 muM) by 26+/-2% (n=61), but unalt
ered by 8BrcAMP or cyclic guanosine-3'-5'monophosphate. 3 Dipyridamole
and hydroxy-nitro-benzylthioguanosine (inhibitors of adenosine transp
ort) and erythro-6-amino-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA, an inhibi
tor of adenosine deaminase), potentiated the depression by adenosine o
f the response to muscarine, and the hyperpolarization to adenosine re
spectively. However, there was no evidence to support the hypothesis t
hat there was spontaneous release of endogenous adenosine under the co
nditions of study, as dipyridamole or EHNA did not alter the control d
.c. potential or the depolarization to muscarine. 4 It is concluded th
at the ability of adenosine to hyperpolarize and depress the response
of the rat SCG to muscarine is due to the direct activation of postsyn
aptic somatodendritic P1-purinoceptors and unlikely to be mediated by
an increase in intracellular cAMP. In addition the rat SCG has mechani
sms for both the uptake and inactivation of adenosine.