The effects of various types of information upon numerical and verbal
probability judgements were evaluated in six problems. Subjects judged
the occurrence of a target event either by assessing the adequacy of
the expressions probable and improbable or by assessing the numerical
probability of the event. Different types of information were manipula
ted for a given problem: the weight of the target in relation to the t
otal weight of all alternatives (global weight) or in relation to that
of each alternative independently (local weights), the change over ti
me of the target's weight (trend), and the stated base rate. The resul
ts revealed that particular types of information - for example local w
eight - had different effects upon the two response modes. A tentative
interpretation of this verbal-numerical discordance is proposed, sugg
esting different strengths of use of the same information according to
the response modes.