In an exploratory postal survey of 711 drivers stratified by age, sex,
annual mileage, and accident involvement, decision-making style was m
easured using a Decision-Making Questionnaire (DMQ) and driving style
was assessed using a Driving Style Questionnaire (DSQ). Responses to 2
1 items of the DMQ formed seven independent and internally coherent di
mensions according to a principal components (PC) analysis. These were
labelled: control, thoroughness, instinctiveness, social resistance,
hesitancy, perfectionism, and idealism. PC analysis also revealed that
responses to 15 items of the DSQ formed six independent dimensions of
driving style. These were labelled: speed. calmness, social resistanc
e, focus, planning, and deviance. Multiple regression analysis indicat
ed that drivers of 60 years and under who scored lower on thoroughness
were at greater risk of a traffic accident and that this relationship
was mediated by faster driving. This relationship was independent of
age, sex, annual mileage, and all other factors measured. In the drive
rs over 60 years, lower thoroughness, greater hesitancy, and faster dr
iving were independently associated with higher accident rates indepen
dent of all other factors measured. The results provide preliminary su
pport for the view that people import aspects of their general decisio
n-making style into the driving situation, and that in so doing they p
ut themselves at differential risk of having a road traffic accident.