In rat sciatic nerve, relative neural toxicity and relative motor nerv
e conduction blockade were assessed for two amide-linked local anesthe
tics (etidocaine and lidocaine) and two ester-linked local anesthetics
(chloroprocaine and procaine). As measures of neural toxicity, nerve
fiber injury and edema were assayed by light microscopic examination o
f nerve tissue sampled 2 days after perineural (next to the sciatic ne
rve) injection of various concentrations of the local anesthetics. Bot
h nerve injury and edema increased with concentration of local anesthe
tics, but injury was frequently present in nerve fascicles with little
or no edema. In parallel studies, the amplitude of the electrical act
ivity elicited from the interosseous muscles of the foot following ips
ilateral electrical stimulation at the sciatic notch was monitored for
up to 15 minutes to assess the extent of motor nerve blockade. The re
sulting log concentration-response curves were analyzed for difference
s in potency. Both for injury and for conduction block, the order of d
ecreasing potency was: etidocaine, lidocaine, chloroprocaine, procaine
. These results are not consistent with the proposal that ester-linked
agents are more likely than other local anesthetic agents to cause ne
rve injury.