In July 1944, the U.S. Naval Magazine at Port Chicago, California, was
devastated by the largest stateside explosion during World War II. On
e ammunition ship disappeared and another was broken in two at this de
pot near San Francisco; the Navy Court of inquiry found that all evide
nce of the cause also disappeared. In 1982, however a journalist raise
d the possibility that Port Chicago was destroyed by U.S. authorities
in a deliberate, clandestine test of a nuclear weapon. This explanatio
n advanced by a full year the ''official'' historical date of the firs
t nuclear detonation (formerly accepted as the Los Alamos Laboratory's
''Trinity'' test). The reporter presented evidence that the explosion
bore nuclear characteristics, that a gun-type weapon was designed by
that date, and that sufficient uranium 235 had been purified for a Hir
oshima-type bomb. This article examines that evidence critically, and
refutes the conclusion that Port Chicago could have been a nuclear eve
nt. The episode demonstrates insights into the sociology of publishing
astounding knowledge claims, and suggests how historians might better
assist journalists in evaluating such claims.