T. Schilling et al., PACLITAXEL ADMINISTERED OVER 3-H FOLLOWED BY CISPLATIN IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA - A CLINICAL-PHASE-ISTUDY, Oncology, 54(2), 1997, pp. 89-95
We have performed a clinical phase I trial of a combination treatment
with paclitaxel given as 3-hour infusion and cisplatin to determine th
e maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity in patients wi
th recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and nec
k. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Doses administered ranged fro
m 135 mg/m(2) paclitaxel/75 mg/m(2) cisplatin to 250 mg/m(2) paclitaxe
l/100 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Twenty-four patients have been entered into t
his study. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 225-250 mg/
m(2) paclitaxel/100 mg/m(2) cisplatin. The dose-limiting toxicity of t
his regimen was myelosuppression (granulocytopenia). Neurosensory and
neuromotor toxicity was moderate. However, analyses of threshold elect
rotonus studies indicated subclinical neurotoxicity in most patients.
One patient receiving 200 mg/m(2) paclitaxel/100 mg/m(2) cisplatin dev
eloped grade 3 motor-neurotoxicity. Orthostatic hypotension was observ
ed in 8 patients receiving doses of 200 mg/m(2) paclitaxel/100 mg/m(2)
cisplatin or higher. Objective responses were observed at paclitaxel
175 mg/m(2)/cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (n=5; complete response in 1 patient
), paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2)/cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (n=3; partial response
in 3 patients) and at paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2)/cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (n
=8; partial response in 1 patient). Eleven additional patients had sta
ble disease. We conclude that paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infu
sion followed by cisplatin is an active regimen in advanced head and n
eck cancer and that orthostatic hypotension may be a potentially signi
ficant clinical toxicity.